Players
There are 437 (270 female) people, have been recruited through in public places accessible networks. Its mean decades are 23 many years (SD = 5.96). Users were questioned to-do a couple of questionnaires a number of that are not relevant for the most recent studies. Most of the victims gave their advised concur toward launch of the sample ratings for research www.datingranking.net/jackd-review/ motives, and all of was basically given viewpoints to your standard result of the study. New dataset analysed in current studies exists at
Actions
Insecure narcissism are counted to the Hypersensitive Narcissism Measure by Hendin and you may Cheek (1997) regarding the Polish interpretation (discover Czarna ainsi que al. 2014). They consists of ten products that have a great Likert-such effect scale from 1 (firmly differ) to help you 5 (highly consent).
Grandiose narcissism is actually reviewed towards validated Polish version (Bazinska and Drat-Ruszczak 2000) of your Narcissistic Personality List (Raskin and you can Hallway 1979). Stuff had been selected basing towards the factor investigation (loadings exceeding .40) and you will represented another subscales of your NPI: Power (eleven situations), Self-Sufficiency (7), Mirror (5), and you can Exhibitionism (11). Participants rated their degree of endorsement of every declaration using good Likert-types of impulse structure, from 1 (doesn’t connect with me) so you can 5 (applies to me). The sum of the affairs creates a directory off grandiose narcissism. It’s been revealed has just your Likert structure NPI exhibits similar create legitimacy and you may somewhat increased reliability towards fresh forced-solutions structure (Miller et al. 2018a).
The top Five try reviewed that have Shine type (Strus mais aussi al. 2014) of one’s Around the world Identification Item Pool – Larger Four Element Measure (BFAS; DeYoung et al. 2007). This is certainly an one hundred-items measure of feature domains (Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, Extraversion, Neuroticism, and you can Visibility/Intellect) as well as the a few straight down-buy regions of each domain name (Volatility, Detachment, Mercy, Politeness, Industriousness, Orderliness, Warmth, Assertiveness, Intelligence, and Visibility). Members is asked so you can speed simply how much the brand new statements is related on them towards a good Likert-sort of measure, in one (highly disagree) to 5 (firmly consent).
Overall performance
First, we looked at the latest correlations anywhere between one or two alternatives away from narcissism and you may identification characteristics including domains and you may issue (Desk step one). Both types of narcissism correlated which have personality traits inside a similar cure for earlier in the day lookup (age.grams. Miller mais aussi al. 2011). Particularly, insecure narcissism is actually undoubtedly coordinated which have Neuroticism, and you will negatively of Agreeableness and you will Extraversion. Grandiose narcissism synchronised absolutely with Extraversion, Openness/Intelligence and you can Conscientiousness, and you will adversely having Neuroticism and you will Agreeableness.
Subsequently, we compared the associations between each type of narcissism and aspects of personality within each domain. Therefore, we tested for the difference between two dependent correlations (Steiger 1980). Figure 1 illustrates graphically the patterns of correlations. We found that vulnerable narcissism was significantly and positively correlated with both aspects of Neuroticism and that correlations did not differ from one another (z =,215, p = 0.820), which supported H1. In addition, consistent with H2, grandiose narcissism was significantly and negatively correlated with Withdrawal, and this correlation was stronger than with Volatility (z = 5.85, p < 0.001). Grandiose narcissism correlated positively with both aspects of Extraversion; however, the association was stronger for Assertiveness (z = , p < 0.001), which supported H3. Vulnerable narcissism was equally negatively related to both Assertiveness and Enthusiasm (z = ?1.90; p = 0.060; H4). The results also supported H5; grandiose narcissism was negatively correlated with both aspects of Agreeableness. However, the correlation with Politeness was significantly stronger (z = 6.26; p < 0.001). The correlation of vulnerable narcissism with both aspects of Agreeableness was negative and the magnitudes of these correlations were similar (z = .261; p = 0.79). Thus, H6 was only partially supported, because we expected a higher association with Compassion. Finally, H7 was also supported: grandiose narcissism correlated positively with Intellect and this association was stronger than with Openness (z = 7.40; p < 0.001).
Leave a Reply