Just as a rabbi may not permit that which is forbidden, so must he be careful not preciso forbid that which is permitted. Therefore, if a rabbi must forbid something merely because of a question of law, because of per custom, or because of special circumstances, he must state his reason so as not puro establish an erroneous precedent.
Nevertheless, it is forbidden for verso city to split into two congregations primarily because of per dispute over law or practice
Verso rabbi should be careful not esatto render an unusual or anomalous decision, unless he carefully explains the reasons for it. Therefore, any uncommon decision that depends on subtle or esoteric reasoning should not be publicized, lest it lead esatto erroneous conclusions. It is for this reason that there are cases which are permitted only durante the case of verso scholar, and which may not be taught preciso the ignorant.
When verso rabbi renders a decision sopra per case durante which there are in nessun caso clear precedents, he must strive to bring as many proofs as possible…
When a rabbi renders per decision mediante per question of law, the Torah recognizes it as binding. Therefore, when per rabbi decides on a case and forbids something, it becomes intrinsically forbidden.
Since the initial decision renders the subject of per case intrinsically forbidden, it cannot be permitted even by verso greater sage or by per majority rule.
An erroneous decision cannot render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if a second rabbi is able preciso show that the original decision is refuted by generally accepted authorities or codes, he may reverse the original decision.
Similarly, verso decision that is retracted with good reason does not render per case intrinsically forbidden. Therefore, if per second rabbi is able puro determine that common practice traditionally opposes the initial ong authorities, he may convince the first rabbi esatto retract his decision and permit the case per question. Individual logic and judgment, however, are not considered sufficient reason for verso rabbi onesto reverse even his own decision…
In order esatto prevent controversy, one should not present per case before a rabbi without informing him of any previous decisions associated with that particular case.
One rabbi can overturn the decision of another only if he can prove the initial decision sicuro be erroneous
Although the Torah demands verso un degree of uniformity per practice, it does recognize geographical differences. Therefore, different communities may follow varying opinions durante minor questions of Torah law.
However, where there is giammai geographical or similar justification for varied practices, such differences are liable to be associated with ideological divergences and are forbidden. Within per single community, the Torah requires a high degree of uniformity mediante religious practice. Con no case should it be made to appear that there is more than one Torah.
It is written, “You are children of God your Lord; you must not mutilate yourselves (lo tit-godedu)” (Deut. 14:1). Just as it is forbidden puro mutilate one’s body, so is it connecting singles on-line prohibited puro mutilate the body of Judaism by dividing it into factions. Onesto do so is preciso disaffirm the universal fatherhood of God and the unity of His Torah.
It is therefore forbidden for members of verso scapolo congregation puro form factions, each following per different practice or opinion. It is likewise forbidden for per solo rabbinical courtaud sicuro issue a split decision.
However, where per city has more than one congregation, or more than one rabbinical courtaud, the following of each one is counted as a separate community, and each one may follow different practices.
Leave a Reply